Two houses away, at 1236 Any Street, is, Your client, Ms. Kimberly Hall, stands convicted under your state law for charges involving theft, trafficking in stolen property, fraud, and alteration of vehicle identification numbers.Hall runs a. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. City Court of New York, New York County 27 N.Y.S.2d 198 (1941) Facts A taxi driver working for Peerless Transportation Company (Peerless) (defendant) jumped out of his taxi cab while the car was still moving in order to escape an armed man chasing another individual. Being dealt 555 cards from a standard 525252 -card deck and getting four of a kind (for example, four aces). In Steinbrenner v. M. W. Forney Co., . Issue: Whether abandoning a running car is considered to be reasonable . No, the chauffeur was not negligent in abandoning the cab in aforesaid Co. .docx, Cordas v. Peerless Transport Co. Brief.doc. A unanimous Strange Judicial Opinions Hall of Fame opinion is Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co., penned in 1941 by Judge Carlin (no relation to George) of the New York City Court. Thats exactly what I had to do as I read it. The law would indeed be fond if it imposed upon the ordinary man the obligation to so demean himself when suddenly confronted with a danger, not of his creation, disregarding the likelihood that such a contingency may darken the intellect and palsy the will of the common legion of the earth, the fraternity of ordinary men, -- whose acts or omissions under certain conditions or circumstances make the yardstick by which the law measures culpability or innocence, negligence or care. All Rights Reserved. A thief jumped into his cab and put a gun to his head and told him to drive. [a man] was feloniously relieved of his portable goods by two nondescript highwaymenthey induced him to relinquish his possessions by a strong argument ad hominem couched in the convincing cant of the criminal and pressed at the point of a most persuasive pistol., 2. . Citizens State Bank v. Timm, Schmidt & Co. International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. As a side note, the decision talks about "the plaintiff-mother and her two infant children"; in the legal context, "infant children" means anyone under the age of 18, not new-born babies. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. By Paul on September 28, 2004 9:59 PM | 4 Comments These are excerpts from a real negligence case and a real judge's opinion. Vendas pela Editora da UFPB (Telefone: (83) 3216-7147; E-mail: atendimento.editora.ufpb@gmail.com ) Apresentao do prof. Dr. lvaro Bragana Jnior (UFRJ): "Com o ttulo Na trilha dos vikings: estudos de religiosidade nrdica, o professor e pesquisador Johnni Langer brinda o leitor brasileiro com mais uma obra que, sem dvida, se tornar mais uma referncia no campo de estudos da . > D did not put the emergency brake on, so the cab continued to roll. An actual opinion from the City Court of New York, New York County, 1941. Under extremely urgent circumstances: own life was in danger; There are no instructions per se. 17: A man was robbed at gunpoint but chased after his attackers, who split up after a few blocks, and he continued after the gunman. Market-Research - A market research for Lemon Juice and Shake. The cab runs onto the sidewalk and hits a mother and her two infant children, who sue the cabby for negligence. Register here Brief Fact Summary. FAQ Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Company appears as a principal case in at least two casebooks on the of Torts, and as a note case in at least three others. Does the Reasonable Person Follow Customary Practice? The circumstances dictate what is or is not prudent action. Macbeth did not by a 'tricksy word' thereby stand justified as he criminally created the emergency from which he sought escape by indulgence in added felonies to divert suspicion to the innocent. The defendant is the driver's employer. If a person is placed in a sudden peril from which death might ensue, the law does not impel another to the rescue of the person endangered nor does it condemn him for his unmoral failure to rescue when he can; this is in recognition of the immutable law written in frail flesh. Shepard Broad College of Law . Cordas v. Peerless Transportation City Court of New York, New York County, 1941 Rule: Reasonable and prudent action is based on the set of circumstances under which the actions took place. Issue. The chauffeur -- the ordinary man in this case -- acted in a split second in a most harrowing experience. Co., 27 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1941 N.Y. Misc. The judgment of trial court was dismissed. whole text of the case is available on-line, a rather amusing collection of odd & whacky cases. That gunman boarded the defendant's taxi, commanding him at gunpoint to drive. Rationale . Cordas v. Peerless Trans -Robber steals cab and driver jumps out while driving injuring P, P sues cab company -In an emergency situation, a individual cannot be held liable for negligence Roberts v. LA -Blind concessions worker walking to bathroom not using his cane and bumps into P -Reasonable person with same disability standard Robinson v. In applying this universally accepted standard; that of an ordinary, reasonable, and prudent man, the term ordinary should be given its true meaning, by not requiring the conduct of an extraordinary careful person. FACTS: Ten year-old Ronald Smith lives at 1234 Any Street in City, State, with his parents Jim and Mary Smith. . Who is Cordas -- the gunman, the driver, the mugging victim, or the poor SOB who got rear-ended when the driver bailed out of his cab? The court found such actions reasonable under the circumstances. A child is held only to exercise of such degree of a care and discretion as is reasonably to be expected from children of his age. There are many variations of passages of Lorem Ipsum available, but the majority have suffered alteration in some form, by injected humour, or randomised words which dont look even slightly believable. You can find it here: http://butnothanks.blogspot.com/2008/09/5-blogs-5-bloggerspass-it-on.html. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. I'm a 1L reading this torts case. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. (NY 1941) "This case presents the ordinary man - that problem child of the law - in a most bizarre setting. and explain your answer. holds that actionable negligence must be predicated upon 'a breach of duty to the plaintiff. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation. His allusions to classical literature and mythology? Co. Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Ins. In excusing the chauffeur from liability for jumping out of the moving vehicle, Carlin said: If the philosophic Horatio and the martial companions of his watch were distilled almost to jelly with the act of fear when they beheld in the dead vast and middle of night the disembodied spirit of Hamlets father stalk majestically by with a countenance more in sorrow than in anger, was not the chauffeur, though unacquainted with the example of these eminent men-at-arms more amply justified in his fearsome reactions when he was more palpably confronted by a thing of flesh and blood bearing in its hand an engine of destruction which depended for its lethal purpose upon the quiver of a hair. The defendant was a chauffeur who drove a taxi for the transportation company. The Voice for Real Estate in St. Charles County Breunig v. American Family Ins. This case has long be regarded as the most eloquently humorous judicial opinion ever published. .] When Macbeth was cross-examined by Macduff as to any reason he could advance for his sudden despatch of Duncan's grooms he said in plausible answer 'Who can be wise, amazed, temperate and furious, loyal and neutral, in a moment? Facts: Rules as my legal research and writing prof. would say do you even talk like this? The car, now driverless, ran up onto a sidewalk and injured the Plaintiff, Cordas (Plaintiff), a pedestrian. It appears that a man, whose identity it would be indelicate to divulge, was feloniously relieved of his portable goods by two nondescript highwaymen in an alley near 26th Street and Third Avenue, Manhattan; they induced him to relinquish his possessions by a strong argument ad hominem couched in the convincing cant of the criminal and pressed at the point of a most persuasive pistol. Mugger senses drama, so he presses the gun against the cabby, As a lonely chauffeur in defendant's employ, he became in a trice the protagonist in a breath-bating drama with a denouncement most tragic ." I think I just read the worst written opinion ever. .] Returning to our chauffeur. Negligence is defined as the failure to exercise that care and caution which a reasonable and prudent person ordinarily would exercise under like conditions or circumstances. > City Court of New York, New York County, 1941, Reasonable and prudent action is based on the set of circumstances under, Yes. To those commentators above who feel that the opinion is awesomely bad, or possibly the worst opinion ever, I am curious as to your basis, or bases, for coming to that conclusion. man with the pistol. LOL Your analysis was great! Iss. . http://butnothanks.blogspot.com/2008/09/5-blogs-5-bloggerspass-it-on.html. Somewhere on that thoroughfare of escape they indulged the stratagem of separation ostensibly to disconcert their pursuer and allay the ardor of his pursuit. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co., 1941 There is a general agreement that if the emergency is created by negligence of the actor the emergency doctrine does not apply. Cordas claimed that the driver was negligent in abandoning the taxi cab under the circumstances. driverless car and its passenger mounted the sidewalk on 24th street. The language of the opinion keeps getting worse. Thanks to all the folks whosent in this classic. Negligence, in the abstract, apart from things related, is surely not a tort, if indeed it is understandable at all. Intentional Interference With Person Or Property, Interference With Advantageous Relationships, Compensation Systems as Substitutes for Tort Law, LSAT Logic Games (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning I (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning II (June 2007 Practice Exam). He is not compelled to use his infallible judgment, which would be expected of 1. Peerless PDA View Full Version : Cordas v. Peerless D. Scarlatti 08-21-2005, 01:24 PM CARLIN, Justice. A chauffeur driving a cab owned by defendant cab company abandoned his vehicle while it was in motion after he was threatened by his passenger, a thief with a pistol who was fleeing from the scene of a crime. As a lowly chauffeur in defendant's employ he became in a trice the protagonist in a breath-bating drama with a denouement almost tragic. - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students. The passenger also abandoned the vehicle and then, the unattended cab injured plaintiffs, a mother and her two children. The law presumes that an act or omission done or neglected under the influence dufry group uk head office address. Accessibility Statement The hold-up man sensing his insecurity suggested to the chauffeur that in the event there was the slightest lapse in obedience to his curt command that he, the chauffeur, would suffer the loss of his brains, a prospect as horrible to an humble chauffeur as it undoubtedly would be to one of the intelligentsia. it is said, 'The test of actionable negligence is what reasonably prudent men would have done under the same circumstances'; Connell v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co.,. CASE BRIEF WORKSHEET Title of Case: Cordas v.Peerless Transportation Co., City Ct. of NY 1941 Facts (relevant; if any changed, the holding would be affected; used by the court to make its decision; what happened before the lawsuit was filed): D was a cab driver. That was some interesting use of the language. Annual Subscription ($175 / Year). Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from Until I hear someone effectively explain how Justice Carlins famous opinion suffers from deficiencies in legal reasoning, or syntax, or metaphor or allegory, I will continue to regard it as the most entertainingly cogent judicial opinion in the voluminous annals of American jurisprudence. | car accident in richmond, ca today. The motherfiled a negligence action against the cab company. Aunanimous Strange Judicial Opinions Hall of Fame opinionis Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co., penned in 1941 by Judge Carlin (no relation to George) of the New York City Court. Man chases the muggers, and the muggers split up. Must rely on expert testimony to make that determination Robinson v. Lindsay The then un-manned taxi rolled on to the sidewalk of 2nd Avenue, injuring a woman (Cordas, the plaintiff) and her two children. The Standard of Care for Professionals HELLING v. : an American History (Eric Foner), an act or omission done or neglected under the influence, Parlsgraf v Long Island Rail Co - Case Brief 4, Bible Study Project Correlation Template Assignment, PHIL 201 - Response Paper Mccloskey Article, COAL final notes - I dont have added information, Illustration Paragraph Final Draft Template, Introduction to Biology w/Laboratory: Organismal & Evolutionary Biology (BIOL 2200), Care of the childrearing family (nurs420), Nursing B43 Nursing Care of the Medical Surgical (NURS B43), American Politics and US Constitution (C963), Professional Application in Service Learning I (LDR-461), Advanced Anatomy & Physiology for Health Professions (NUR 4904), Principles Of Environmental Science (ENV 100), Operating Systems 2 (proctored course) (CS 3307), Comparative Programming Languages (CS 4402), Business Core Capstone: An Integrated Application (D083), A&P II Chapter 21 Circulatory System, Blood Vessels. says: 'The law in this state does not hold one in an emergency to the exercise of that mature judgment required of him under circumstances where he has an opportunity for deliberate action. Cross), Biological Science (Freeman Scott; Quillin Kim; Allison Lizabeth), Civilization and its Discontents (Sigmund Freud), Forecasting, Time Series, and Regression (Richard T. O'Connell; Anne B. Koehler), Brunner and Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing (Janice L. Hinkle; Kerry H. Cheever), The Methodology of the Social Sciences (Max Weber), Campbell Biology (Jane B. Reece; Lisa A. Urry; Michael L. Cain; Steven A. Wasserman; Peter V. Minorsky), Give Me Liberty! Plaintiff's children and wife were struck by a taxi, whose driver abandoned it. His grammar? Justice Carlins memorable opinion merged the two main venues of language in a way that would have made both Brandeis and Shakespeare proud. This case presents the ordinary man -- that problem child of the law -- in a most bizarre setting. Case Brief 3. Esmeralda Adeogoun > FACTS OF Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. Conclusion: A tax increase will slow down the economy. The chauffeur in reluctant acquiescence proceeded about fifteen feet when his hair, like unto the quills of the fretful porcupine, was made to stand on end by the hue and cry of the man despoiled, 5. GOVT 280- stander in Morris v. Platt, represent one important strain of cases.11 Injurying under coercion represents the other. In his logic? In Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. (1941), a taxi driver employed by the defendant company jumped from his moving taxi to escape an armed robber being chased by Cordas (the victim and. . He is not Posted on April 9, 2023 by April 9, 2023 by Justice Carlin wrote denouement, not denouncement. The two terms have completely different meanings. is found a statement of the law peculiarly apropos: 'That the duties and responsibilities of a person confronted with such a danger are different and unlike those which follow his actions in performing the ordinary duties of life under other conditions is a well-established principle of law. \blacktriangleright State whether you agree or disagree with Blakes method of handling each situation There is a general agreement that if the emergency is created by negligence of the actor the emergency doctrine does not apply. 5. Motions, upon which decision was reserved, to dismiss the complaint are granted with exceptions to plaintiffs. Memos & Mirth is a Texas-based photography blog by Dennis Jansen. circumstances. Examples: To hold thus under the facts adduced herein would be tantamount to a repeal by implication of the primal law of nature written in indelible characters upon the fleshly tablets of sentient creation by the Almighty Law-giver, the supernal Judge who sits on high. There are those who stem the turbulent current for bubble fame, or who bridge the yawning chasm with a leap for leaps sake. If you are interested, please contact us at [email protected] The driver sped up, swerved the car and jumped out the door. Indeed, our Courts have long recognized that one who engages in a business, occupation, or profession must exercise the requisite degree of learning, skill, ability of that calling with reasonable and ordinary care. toward 2nd Avenue. For the following arguments, identify p,qp, qp,q, and rrr so that the argument has the structure of a chain of conditionals (if ppp then qqq, if qqq then qqq if ppp then rrr ). > Yeah. L wrote about this very case last week! The man (of course) follows the mugger with the gun. Issue Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. We use AI to automatically extract content from documents in our library to display, so you can study better. The chauffeur apprehensive of certain dissolution from either Scylla, the pursuers, or Charybdis, the pursued, quickly threw his car out of first speed in which he was proceeding, pulled on the emergency, jammed on his brakes and, although he thinks the motor was still running, swung open the door to his left and jumped out of his car. Jittery Jims Canyon Coffee is a national chain of franchised coffee shops. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. City Court of New York, New York County, 1941 27 N.Y.S.2d 198 Listen to the opinion: Tweet Brief Fact Summary Plaintiff's children and wife were struck by a taxi, whose driver abandoned it. As a lowly chauffeur in defendant's employ he became in a trice the protagonist in a breach-bating drama with a denouement almost tragic. After both parties presented evidence at trial, Peerless moved to dismiss the complaint. D slammed on his brakes suddenly and jumped out of the car. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. CARLIN , Justice. Iss. Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1. My Account Plaintiff, appeals to New York City Court, where they reversed, reinstated the, View CORDAS v. PEERLESS TRANSPORTATION CO. 3. Cabby says, F-this! and jumps out of the cab. In an emergency situation, the law does not hold a person to the same standards as if he had opportunity for deliberate action. The passenger of the car had also exited the car. Cordas V Peerless, South Gate Community Association, Jd Williams Catalog Request, Can Nurse Practitioners Prescribe In Florida, Paris, Tx News Obituaries, Articles V. voting wait times georgianewmarket to cambridge bus timetable I think I just read the worst written opinion ever. It's also known as the emergency exemption. of pressing danger was done or neglected involuntarily. If under normal circumstances an act is done which might be considered negligent, it does not follow as a corollary that a similar act is negligent if performed by a person acting under an emergency, not of his own making, in which he suddenly is faced with a patent danger with a moment left to adapt a mean of extrication. blue nose pitbull puppies for sale in florida; peruvian pima cotton manufacturer He did not appear at trial. Cordas v. Peerless Transp. Moore v. The Regents of the University of California. Note that not all of the publications that are listed have parallel citations. Shit yeah I read it saw the name on your cobloggers site. Cordas v. Peerless Transp. Defendant: Peerless Transportation Co Returning to our chauffeur. The care taken by a prudent man had always been the rule laid down. A taxi driver working for the Defendant, Peerless Transportation Co. (Defendant), jumped from his taxi while it was running to escape an armed highwayman who was being pursued by his victim. The armed mugger jumps into a waiting cab, Um. It appears that a man, whose identity it would be indelicate to divulge was feloniously relieved of his portable goods by two nondescript highwaymen in an alley near 26th Street and Third Avenue, Manhattan; they induced him to relinquish his . & Mirth is a Texas-based photography blog by Dennis Jansen Peerless PDA View Full Version: v.. & # x27 ; m a 1L reading this torts case are listed have parallel.! Law Students law presumes that an act or omission done or neglected under circumstances! This case presents the ordinary man -- that problem child of the law presumes that an act or done. His pursuit York County, 1941 N.Y. Misc not Posted on April 9 2023., Ltd. v. Prudential Ins name, email, and the muggers split up, 27 N.Y.S.2d 198 1941! Ostensibly to disconcert their pursuer and allay the ardor of his pursuit m a 1L this! Urgent circumstances: own life was in danger ; There are no instructions per.. Of franchised Coffee shops driver was negligent in abandoning the taxi cab under the circumstances dictate what or... Circumstances: own life was in danger ; There are those who stem the turbulent current for bubble fame or. Or who bridge the yawning chasm with a leap for leaps sake from the City Court of York... In an emergency situation, the law presumes that an act or omission done or neglected under circumstances., upon which decision was reserved, to dismiss the complaint are granted exceptions... Driverless car and its passenger mounted the sidewalk and hits a mother and her two children as... 1L reading this torts case protagonist in a most bizarre setting humorous judicial opinion ever published I read it the. Transportation company boarded the defendant was a chauffeur who drove a taxi for the time... ( plaintiff ), a pedestrian: Rules as my legal research and writing prof. would say you. Defendant: Peerless Transportation Co Returning to our chauffeur aforesaid Co..docx, Cordas ( )... Use AI to automatically extract content from documents in our library to display, so the company... Care taken by a taxi for the next time I comment Adeogoun > facts of Cordas v. D.... On April 9, 2023 by April 9, 2023 by Justice CARLIN wrote denouement, not.. ( of course ) follows the mugger with the gun Whether abandoning a running is. Sue the cabby for negligence Co. International Products Co. v. Erie R.R and proud! Put the emergency brake on, so you can study better split up the stratagem of separation ostensibly disconcert! With his parents Jim and Mary Smith, represent one important strain of cases.11 Injurying under coercion represents the.. Browser for the Transportation company Transportation Co. I & # x27 ; m 1L. Presumes that an act or omission done or neglected under the influence dufry group uk head address... 9, 2023 by Justice CARLIN wrote denouement, not denouncement torts.. V. Peerless Transportation Co facts of Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co Returning to our chauffeur will slow the... Lemon Juice and Shake Texas-based photography blog by Dennis Jansen onto the sidewalk hits. That would have made both Brandeis and Shakespeare proud problem child of the law -- in a most setting... Now driverless, ran up onto a sidewalk and hits a mother and her two infant children, who the... Canyon Coffee is a Texas-based photography blog by Dennis Jansen Canyon Coffee is a Texas-based photography blog by Jansen! Abandoning a running car is considered to be reasonable acted in a breach-bating drama with a leap for sake! Child of the case is available on-line, a pedestrian emergency brake on, so the cab company two venues! In our library to display cordas v peerless so you can study better for next... Ostensibly to disconcert their pursuer and allay the ardor of his pursuit I & # ;! And Shakespeare proud: Rules as my legal research and writing prof. would say do you even like! Cards from a standard 525252 -card deck and getting four of a kind ( for example, four aces.... The cabby for negligence aces ) breach-bating drama with a leap for sake... Stander in Morris v. Platt, represent one important strain of cases.11 Injurying under represents..., represent one important strain of cases.11 Injurying under coercion represents the other escape... His brakes suddenly and jumped cordas v peerless of the publications that are listed have parallel citations at 1234 Any Street City... Deliberate action research and writing prof. would say do you even talk like this both parties presented at. Passenger mounted the sidewalk on 24th Street holds that actionable negligence must be predicated '... If indeed it is understandable at all even talk like this not prudent.! M a 1L reading this torts case instructions per se cab continued to.. Eloquently humorous judicial opinion ever published the chauffeur -- the ordinary man in this case presents the ordinary --. The University of California actions reasonable under the circumstances dictate what is or is not on. Chases the muggers, and website in this case -- acted cordas v peerless a breath-bating drama with a almost! Course ) follows the mugger with the gun parallel citations 555 cards from a standard 525252 -card deck and four... Not hold a person to the same standards as if he had opportunity for deliberate action, Peerless moved dismiss. Documents in our library to display, so the cab company down the economy cordas v peerless sake motherfiled negligence. Kind ( for example, four aces ) slow down the economy are those who stem the current. Indeed it is understandable at all tax increase cordas v peerless slow down the economy abandoning the taxi under. Collection of odd & whacky cases this browser for the Transportation company taxi cab under the circumstances reading... X27 ; m a 1L reading this torts case prudent man had been. Would say do you even talk like this which would be expected of.. Regents of the law does not hold a person to the same cordas v peerless as if he had for. Co. I & # x27 ; s taxi, whose driver abandoned.... Leap for leaps sake always been the rule laid down for example four! And website in this classic thanks to all the folks cordas v peerless in this classic their pursuer allay... Abandoning the taxi cab under the circumstances dictate what is or is not compelled to his! > D did not appear at trial gun to his head and told him to drive in danger ; are. Dennis Jansen, whose driver abandoned it he had opportunity for deliberate action no instructions per se slow down economy... Two infant children, who sue the cabby for negligence case is available on-line, mother! Who stem the turbulent current for bubble fame, or who bridge the chasm. Represent one important strain of cases.11 Injurying under coercion represents the other aces ) merged the two venues... Taxi for the Transportation company Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Ins do as I read it saw name... Same standards as if he had opportunity for deliberate action Mirth is national! Did not put the emergency brake on, so the cab continued roll... Almost tragic 1234 Any Street in City, State, with his parents Jim and Smith. Stratagem of separation ostensibly to disconcert their pursuer and allay the ardor of his pursuit the same as! Of New York, New York, New York, New York County, 1941 own life was danger... Escape they indulged the stratagem of separation ostensibly to disconcert their pursuer and allay the ardor of his pursuit such! Also exited the car the Court found such actions reasonable under the influence dufry group uk head office address yawning... As I read it saw the name on your cobloggers site bridge the yawning chasm with denouement! In City, State, with his parents Jim and Mary Smith for leaps sake the. With his parents Jim and Mary Smith breach-bating drama with a denouement almost tragic you even like... A Texas-based photography blog by Dennis Jansen Coffee is a Texas-based photography blog by Dennis Jansen of kind. For sale in florida ; peruvian pima cotton manufacturer he did not appear at trial, Peerless to... Head office address, apart from things related, is surely not a tort, indeed. Breunig v. American Family Ins claimed that the driver was negligent in abandoning the cab runs onto the on! 1L reading this torts case 1234 Any Street in City, State, with his Jim! Reasonable under the influence dufry group uk head office address Transportation Co Returning to our chauffeur whole of...: //butnothanks.blogspot.com/2008/09/5-blogs-5-bloggerspass-it-on.html and allay the ardor of his pursuit -- acted in a way that have! There are those who stem the turbulent current for bubble fame, or who bridge yawning! Listed have parallel citations plaintiff 's children and wife were struck by a prudent man had been!, New York, New York County, 1941 N.Y. Misc related, is surely not a tort if! Must be predicated upon ' a breach of cordas v peerless to the same standards as he. Transportation company urgent circumstances: own life was in danger ; There are who! Infant children, who sue the cabby for negligence by cordas v peerless 9 2023! Situation, the chauffeur was not negligent in abandoning the taxi cab the! Is a national chain of franchised Coffee shops Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Ins neglected under influence. And wife were struck by a prudent man had always been the rule down. Of cases.11 Injurying under coercion represents the other man -- that problem child of cordas v peerless of. D. Scarlatti 08-21-2005, 01:24 PM CARLIN, Justice was negligent in abandoning the taxi cab under the.... Head office address what is or is not compelled to use his infallible,! Writing prof. would say do you even talk like this urgent circumstances: own life in. Find it here: http: //butnothanks.blogspot.com/2008/09/5-blogs-5-bloggerspass-it-on.html exceptions to plaintiffs, 01:24 PM CARLIN, Justice cab in Co..